WC Wisconsin News

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Congressman Derrick Van Orden (WI-03) expressed his dissatisfaction with the Continuing Resolution (CR) in a recent statement. Van Orden, who has previously supported two CRs in the past four months, highlighted the lack of progress in passing Fiscal Year 2024 (FY24) funding and addressing the nation's pressing issues.

"We have a historic crisis and national security threat at our southern border, billions in wasteful government spending, and still no strategic plan for the war in Ukraine," Van Orden stated. He emphasized that the CR brought to the House floor did not offer any solutions to these problems and merely prolonged the practice of budgeting through crisis.

The CR, if passed, would have extended the current budget without making any substantial changes or addressing the urgent concerns facing the nation. Van Orden's decision to vote against the CR reflects his dissatisfaction with the ongoing gridlock in Congress and the failure to prioritize critical issues.

This move by Van Orden aligns with his commitment to finding long-term, sustainable solutions to the challenges facing the country. By opposing the CR, he aims to encourage his colleagues to take immediate action and address the pressing matters at hand.

The congressman's decision reflects a growing frustration among lawmakers who believe that temporary measures like CRs only perpetuate the cycle of inadequate funding and neglect of important issues. Van Orden's statement serves as a reminder that effective governance requires proactive and comprehensive solutions rather than short-term fixes.

As the debate over funding and the nation's top priorities continues, Van Orden's stance underscores the need for a more strategic and forward-thinking approach. By voting against the CR, he sends a clear message that urgent action is necessary to address the challenges facing the nation.

Van Orden's statement serves as a reminder that elected officials have a responsibility to tackle pressing issues head-on and provide effective governance for the American people. The congressman's decision to vote against the CR is a reflection of his commitment to fulfilling this duty and advocating for the best interests of his constituents and the nation as a whole.